<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Twitter is Doomed</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/2009/06/29/why-twitter-is-doomed/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/2009/06/29/why-twitter-is-doomed/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2012 06:11:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: chrisjones</title>
		<link>http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/2009/06/29/why-twitter-is-doomed/#comment-2564</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisjones</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 13:57:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/?p=804#comment-2564</guid>
		<description>Roxanne, I appreciate you being polite (you always are).  I was somewhat TIC on this post, obviously, and as I mentioned, I love Twitter - you and I wouldn&#039;t be corresponding without it - but I persist in the belief that names have serious consequences.  Twitter is a poor name.  I think that it will have a negative impact on the technology&#039;s growth.

But I&#039;m still using it, and still think it&#039;s a great tool.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roxanne, I appreciate you being polite (you always are).  I was somewhat TIC on this post, obviously, and as I mentioned, I love Twitter &#8211; you and I wouldn&#8217;t be corresponding without it &#8211; but I persist in the belief that names have serious consequences.  Twitter is a poor name.  I think that it will have a negative impact on the technology&#8217;s growth.</p>
<p>But I&#8217;m still using it, and still think it&#8217;s a great tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Wonderland</title>
		<link>http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/2009/06/29/why-twitter-is-doomed/#comment-2562</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Wonderland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 06:29:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/?p=804#comment-2562</guid>
		<description>And then you have people like me who don&#039;t tweet, have never tweeted, haven&#039;t even ever been to twitter and persist in referring to those who do as twits.  You&#039;re right, they&#039;re not going to get anywhere with this.  Er, um...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And then you have people like me who don&#8217;t tweet, have never tweeted, haven&#8217;t even ever been to twitter and persist in referring to those who do as twits.  You&#8217;re right, they&#8217;re not going to get anywhere with this.  Er, um&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WriterRoxanne</title>
		<link>http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/2009/06/29/why-twitter-is-doomed/#comment-2560</link>
		<dc:creator>WriterRoxanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 19:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thechrisjonesgroup.com/chrisjonesmortgage/?p=804#comment-2560</guid>
		<description>Very interesting observations, Chris. I tend to agree, to some degree, that the notion that Twitter&#039;s moniker may be getting in the way of growth and wider adoption. &quot;Twitter&quot; as a brand name seems to connotate something trivial and inconsequential. And, as we&#039;ve all borne witness to in recent weeks, in the hands of participatory social networking advocates, Twitter is anything but. Twitter&#039;s staying power will be predicated on the expanded uses that users discover for the application.
ttp://roxanneblanford.blogspot.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting observations, Chris. I tend to agree, to some degree, that the notion that Twitter&#8217;s moniker may be getting in the way of growth and wider adoption. &#8220;Twitter&#8221; as a brand name seems to connotate something trivial and inconsequential. And, as we&#8217;ve all borne witness to in recent weeks, in the hands of participatory social networking advocates, Twitter is anything but. Twitter&#8217;s staying power will be predicated on the expanded uses that users discover for the application.<br />
ttp://roxanneblanford.blogspot.com/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

